The focus of the Chief of Army (CA) Scholarships is to enable high performing individual’s time to invest in academic research of immediate benefit to the Australian Army, both in a broad sense and those that specifically address future warfare and the State of the Australian Army Profession.
The CA annually selects personnel to undertake research or professional development opportunities that will benefit Army from:
- research that broadly aligns with the Army Futures Research Framework.
- the professional development of scholarship recipients through their exposure to a diverse range of experiences and complex activities not normally available in Army.
The Chief of Army's Scholarship is awarded annually to soldiers and officers (SGT to LTCOL). The Scholarship supports academic research that will contribute to the development of Army’s intellectual capital.
Current CA Scholars
2026
|
MAJ Anne-Maree Hunt This study analyses children’s drawings and narratives from a national “Our Australian Soldier” art competition to understand how Australian youth perceive the modern soldier, and to assess how these perceptions align with the Army’s envisioned identity for 2030. |
|
CHAP Jessica Grant The thesis investigates how the military profession morally and conceptually relates to the medical, legal, and religious professions, and argues for a clearer understanding of how these traditions coexist within armed forces and shape the unique moral character of the Army. |
|
LTCOL Tennille Marsh How effective have legal frameworks for command accountability been in achieving professional self regulation for commanders of the Australian Defence Force for the preparation and conduct of the full spectrum of military operations? Renewed focus on the concept of command accountability for western militaries in the past 5 years, driven by revelations surrounding war crimes and abuse allegations, has spurred questions around holding commanders and leaders to account for their command failures. The ADF must ensure that its command accountability legal framework is suitable for both peacetime and potential armed conflict. The extant literature and research is insufficient to answer these questions in the Australian context and this thesis will explore the effectiveness of Australian legal frameworks for command accountability. |
Previous CA Scholars
2025
|
LTCOL Samantha Hodges Seeks to enhance the Australian Army’s suicidality surveillance, which was heavily scrutinised by the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide. Surveillance refers to the systematic data collection and analysis that allows for effectives design, implementation and evaluation of prevention policy and programs. |
|
LTCOL Yong Yi Empirical Validation of SDCC for Machine Learning Model's Transferability Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems often perform well only in the specific settings they are trained on. Unlike humans – who can adapt across different conditions like day or night, urban or natural – AI models can struggle when the context changes. This creates a challenge: how can we be confident the model will perform well during its deployment? Set Difference Combinatorial Coverage (SDCC) is a way to measure how different two datasets are. SDCC can predict how well a Machine Learning (ML) model will perform without needing to test it. This research aims to validate SDCC using larger, more complex datasets – helping to anticipate performance, manage deployment risk, and guide improvement of models (through targeted additional training, known as transfer learning). |
2024
|
LTCOL Benjamin Gray The research consists of an examination of the utility of Aristotelian Virtue Ethics as a framework for command, planning and decision-making at the tactical level of war via a synthesis of virtue ethics and key doctrinal warfighting concepts to overcome moral and intellectual friction. The objective is to provide combatants with intellectual and ethical skills to ensure they are prepared to overcome the dangers and complexity of future tactical battlefields. |
2023
|
LTCOL David Cave Honoured Partners: The British Relationship with Governments-in-exile During the Second World War Examines how Britain supported its European allies during the Second World War, and identifies lessons for contemporary strategists and planners. What emerges from the analysis is a greater understanding of the complexities of managing alliances in wartime, the many dilemmas faced by junior alliance partners, and the potential benefits and hazards of employing military and diplomatic power to achieve influence. |